Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Hannaman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1921No. 1831PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Potter County; Henry S. Bishop, Judge. Suit by Bessie S. Hannaman against Sam Morris, John J. Gordon, and others, to recover the amount of a note and foreclose a trust deed securing it. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant John J. Gordon appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

Appellee, Bessie S. Hannaman, recovered judgment in the court below against Sam Morris, one of the defendants, for the sum of $13,591.10, with foreclosure of deed of trust lien against the said defendant, and also Sam Curtis and John J. Gordon, on certain property situated in the city of Amarillo. Prom this judgment defendant John J. Gordon appeals.

The only question for decision is as to the right of the plaintiff in the court below to enforce her deed of trust lien against the property in question as against the defendant John J. Gordon, and we make the following statement of facts and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Ricker, Lee & Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Ufford v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Dunphy v. RiddleIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hannaman v. GordonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Puntney v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Holford v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Hill v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Cavers v. Sioux Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API