Legal Opinion

Doe v. Boy Scouts of America

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2009No. Nos. 35639, 35681PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

The Boy Scouts of America and the Ore-Ida Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America (collectively the BSA) were granted a permissive interlocutory appeal to challenge the district court’s ruling that the claims asserted in this case by Ronald Morgan, John Doe I, and John Doe II (collectively the Does) are not barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

Factual and Procedural History

Between 1979 and 1980, Morgan alleges that he was abused by James Schmidt in the *429course of his participation in a Boy Scout program in Nampa, Idaho. Morgan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Medical Center Physicians, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hayden Lake Fire Protection District v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Ford v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. Oblates of St. Francis de SalesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. Arambarri v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Ada County Highway District v. Brooke View, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. Lance Tyrell TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API