Legal Opinion

Goulding Fertilizer Co. v. Watts

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Escambia County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.

— The declaration herein is as follows:

“The plaintiff Ed Watts, by his attorney, sues the defendant, The Goulding Fertilizer Co., a corporation, for that, to-wit:—

On the 26th day of January, A. D. 1911, at and in the County of Escambia, State of Florida, the defendant was possessed of, owned and operated a certain large and extensive fertilizer works, wherein it manufactured certain fertilizers for the wholesale trade in the manufacture of which it employed a large force of men: that, in the manufacture of said fertilizer, the defendant used a certain dangerous acid, which would on coming in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. German American Lumber Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Adams v. Grand Rapids Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Flowers v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gunn v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Coons v. Pritchard ex rel. PritchardSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  3. Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Brand v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API