Leighton v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Justice.
After verdict for plaintiff in an action to recover the reasonable value of services rendered, defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.
' While employed by defendant as a securities salesman, plaintiff, in December, 1930, closed a sale of 9,000 shares of First Bank Stock Corporation stock. Circumstances which need not be gone into entitled him to a commission on quantum meruit. He wanted 45, defendant conceding that it owed him at least 22y2, cents a share. The jury agreed with neither, but allowed plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Preston v. GrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
- Duluth Chamber of Commerce v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Macomber v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Agnew v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. SallbladSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Sutton v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- St. Cloud Aviation, Inc. v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Meyer v. Mason Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985