Paul H. Smith v. Thomas O'donnell, of the Estate of Corwin Denney
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Willett
This legal-malpractice appeal turns on whether Belt1 or Barcelo2 should control. Decided a decade apart, both decisions have their place in our jurisprudence— Barcelo states the general rule (non-clients *425cannot file malpractice suits), Belt the exception (executors sometimes can). Unlike the Court, I believe today’s case is governed by Barcelo’s general privity barrier, as it is rife with Barcelo&emdash;like concerns of divided loyalties and conflicts of interest. Indeed, this case presents exactly the sort of gamesmanship flagged in Belt, “an opportunity for some disappointed beneficiaries…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barcelo v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Guest v. Cochran, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Baker Botts, L.L.P. v. Cailloux, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- Stoll v. Henderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.