Legal Opinion · Dissent

Paul H. Smith v. Thomas O'donnell, of the Estate of Corwin Denney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2009No. 07-0697Published

1DissentJustice Willett

This legal-malpractice appeal turns on whether Belt1 or Barcelo2 should control. Decided a decade apart, both decisions have their place in our jurisprudence— Barcelo states the general rule (non-clients *425cannot file malpractice suits), Belt the exception (executors sometimes can). Unlike the Court, I believe today’s case is governed by Barcelo’s general privity barrier, as it is rife with Barcelo&emdash;like concerns of divided loyalties and conflicts of interest. Indeed, this case presents exactly the sort of gamesmanship flagged in Belt, “an opportunity for some disappointed beneficiaries…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barcelo v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Guest v. Cochran, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. Baker Botts, L.L.P. v. Cailloux, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  5. Stoll v. Henderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API