Legal Opinion

State v. Candelario

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 2008No. 27,299Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

{1} In State v. Rackley, 2000-NMCA-027, 128 N.M. 761, 998 P.2d 1212, this Court held that the defendant’s trial commenced for purposes of the district court six-month rule when the jury was selected. The present case raises the question of when a trial commences for purposes of the metropolitan court’s counterpart to the six-month rule (the 182-day rule) when a defendant is tried by a judge rather than a jury. Applying the principles enunciated in Rackley and related six-month rule cases, we conclude that the 182-day rule was satisfied in this ease, notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. EskridgeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. SaavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API