Legal Opinion

McCormack v. Bertschinger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1925PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] IN BANC.

AFFIRMED. Defendant, the owner of Lot 9 of Block 76, in the Laurelhurst addition to the City of Portland, appeals from a decree foreclosing a lien on said lot for labor and material furnished in the construction of a dwelling-house, garage, driveway, certain walks connecting with the house, and a retaining wall, all on said lot. He received in part payment the sum of $250 and claimed a lien for the balance remaining after deducting the amount of said…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Kezartee v. Marks & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Harrisburg Lumber Co. v. WashburnOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Giant-Powder Co. v. Oregon Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1890
  5. Hughes v. LansingOregon Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Brown's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Schram v. ManaryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hough v. ZehrnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Andersen v. TurpinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API