Legal Opinion

Michaels v. Pacific Soft Water Laundry

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1930No. Docket No. 7256PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, Acting P. J.

Petitioners sued under section 315 of the Civil Code, to test the validity of an election of directors of the respondent Pacific Soft Water Laundry Corporation. Petitioners had judgment from which three separate appeals were taken. The respondents Bull, Fletcher and Craft joined with the corporation in one appeal, the respondent Thompson appeals in his own behalf, as does the respondent Marine Bank of Ocean Park. All appeals are by stipulation heard upon the same bill of exceptions.

The controversy comes out of the same transactions which were considered in Michaels et al. v. Pacific Soft…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Truett v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Stewart v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Green v. Caribou Oil Min. Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Michaels v. Pacific Soft Water LaundryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. PapazianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gomez v. CecenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hedden v. WaldeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. First Trust & Savings Bank v. RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Michaels v. Pacific Soft Water LaundryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Lissauer v. Union Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API