Legal Opinion
Goodstein v. Weinberg
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 9, 1978No. Record 770373PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarman, J.
By this appeal Joseph S. Goodstein and Sheldon Ruben, individually and trading as G & R Associates (plaintiffs or Associates), challenge the trial court’s ruling sustaining a plea of the statute of limitations filed by Jay M. Weinberg, Allan S. Buffenstein, Hirschler & Fleischer, Attorneys, a partnership, and Hirschler, Fleischer, Weinberg, Cox & Allen, Attorneys, a partnership (defendants or H & F), in the plaintiffs’ action seeking damages from H & F for alleged fraud, professional malpractice and negligence. The real issue is whether, upon the record before us, the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oleyar v. Kerr, TrusteeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- Wright v. EverettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Higa v. MirikitaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Schirmer v. NethercuttWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Juhnke v. HessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Kamlar Corp. v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- LaVay Corp. v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- MacLellan v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Warden v. Bank of MingoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- The Lavay Corporation Gerard M. Lavay v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Association, and William L. Walde David A. Neal James Winston Bray William J. Dorn, the Lavay Corporation Gerard M. Lavay v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Association, and William L. Walde David A. Neal James Winston Bray William J. Dorn, the Lavay Corporation Gerard M. Lavay v. William J. Dorn, and Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Association William L. Walde David A. Neal James Winston BrayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.