Legal Opinion

Hootstein v. Amherst-Pelham Regional School Committee

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 11, 2019No. 3:17-cv-30146Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MICHAEL HOOTSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-30146-MGM AMHERST-PELHAM REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. No. 12) February 11, 2019 MASTROIANNI, U.S.D.J. Plaintiff Michael Hootstein is a custodial grandparent of a student at Amherst Regional High School (“ARHS”) and of a young child who will attend Amherst schools. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and brought claims against Defendant Amherst-Pelham Regional School Committee (“Defendant”) related to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API