Legal Opinion

Denisco v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 16, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered on or about July 12, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly caused by a defect in a bicycle path owned or maintained by defendants, denied plaintiffs application to serve a late notice of claim on defendant-respondent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court’s denial of the application to file a late notice of claim was not an improvident exercise of discretion under the circumstances (see Matter of Vargas v New York City Hous. Auth., 232 AD2d 263 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 817 [1997]; Crowell v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gherardi v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Crowell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mouzalas v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API