Legal Opinion

Crowell v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner served a notice of claim on the City two days late, and then waited almost a full year before moving for leave to file the late claim, giving no explanation at all for the delay. The City is prejudiced by weather-related changes in the condition of the allegedly defective sidewalk during the period of delay (cf., Matter of Sutton v Town of Schuyler Falls, 185 AD2d 430, 431-432), and by its inability to identify and interview witnesses (see, Aviles v City of New York, 202 AD2d 530, 532, lv denied 84 NY2d 813). Denial of the motion to file a late notice of claim in these…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zapata v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Aviles v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Sutton v. Town of Schuyler FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Denisco v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API