Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FORTINET, INC., Case No. 20-cv-03343-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS 10 FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Docket No. 115 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 In this action, Defendant Forescout Technologies, Inc. (“Forescout”) counterclaims against 16 Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc. (“Fortinet”), alleging that Fortinet infringed six of its patents and tortiously 17 interfered with its business relations. 18 Pending before the Court is Fortinet’s motion to dismiss Forescout’s…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.