Legal Opinion

State v. Warren

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1977No. 25PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Under his first assignment of error, defendant asserts the court erred in admitting into evidence the knife found on defendant’s person when he was arrested.

Defendant maintains that the knife seized from him at the time of his arrest was irrelevant to the jury’s consideration of this case because, while the State crime laboratory examination revealed blood stains on the knife, the stains could not definitely be identified as human blood or grouped. Defendant points out that the State’s own expert witness, the pathologist who examined the body, testified that, in his opinion,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. MillsapsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. RinckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API