Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 2, 2004No. 02-1242PublishedCited by 400 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

The General Motors Corporation (“GM”) petitions for review of May 7, 2002 letters from an enforcement official at the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regarding nascent enforcement actions based on a regulatory interpretation that automobile manufacturing paint purge solvents are “solid waste” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 et seq., upon exiting the spray painting unit. We dismiss GM’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.

I

A

Subtitle C of RCRA, see 42 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Toilet Goods Ass'n v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by400 opinions

  1. Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Independent Equipment Dealers Ass'n v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  3. P & v Enterprises v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  5. Moran v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

395 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API