Hammond v. Solliday
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Court of Cunmson County. The facts are stated in. the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.
The issue stated by the pleadings, and to which the evidence in this case was directed, required the jury in their verdict to find upon the following questions, viz.: The right to possession of the property in dispute at the commencement of the action, the value *611thereof, and the amount of damages suffered through its wrongful detention. These questions they answered, determining such right of possession in favor of plaintiff, assessing his damages at one cent, and fixing the value of the property at $176.
It is true that no special damages were averred or proven by plaintiff, and for this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Rapier v. Gulf City Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Leonard v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Cole v. ConollySupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Thompsen v. DiffenderferHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1849
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barslund v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Wolf Co. v. State Bank CommissionerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Livingston v. Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1898
- Barslund v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Legere v. StewartColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.