Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Digiacinto v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 2018No. 16AP-248PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Digiacinto v. Indus. Comm.,

2018-Ohio-1999.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. Paul A. Digiacinto, : Relator, : v. : No. 16AP-248 Industrial Commission of Ohio : (REGULAR CALENDAR) and Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp., : Respondents. : DECISION Rendered on May 22, 2018 On brief: The Bainbridge Firm, LLC, Andrew J. Bainbridge, Christopher J. Yeager, and Carol L. Herdman, for relator. On brief: Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Eric J. Tarbox, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. IN MANDAMUS ON OBJECTIONS TO…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Lewis v. Diamond Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Digiacinto v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State ex rel. Bomer v. Indus. Comm. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API