Legal Opinion

City of Silverton v. Porter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 1977No. 80261, CA 6050PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

In May, 1973, the City of Silverton commenced an action for condemnation of defendants’ land and, pursuant to ORS 35.265, 1 obtained a court order granting it "immediate possession of and the right to occupy defendants’ property * * * for the purpose for which it is being condemned * * The City deposited with the court the sum of $12,600, as estimated just compensation for the property. Defendants withdrew the money, paid taxes on it and used it for their own purposes.

The City enjoyed exclusive, continuous and uninterrupted possession from May, 1973, until June 18, 1975, when it filed an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. State Highway Commission v. Assembly of God, PentecostalOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Urban Renewal Agency v. Starr Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Port of Newport v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Montgomery Ward Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Philip D. Thompson v. Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Chelsea Butane Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Chelsea Butane Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API