Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Mueller
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1909No. Docket No. 42PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error to Shiawassee; Miner, J. Assumpsit by Frederick W. Hooper and James D. Glavin against Louis Mueller and Charles Mueller, co-partners as Mueller Brothers, for rent. A judgment for plaintiffs for less than the amount claimed is reviewed by them on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Plaintiffs on June 3,1903, leased to defendants a certain building in Alma, Mich., and the hotel furniture and fixtures therein for a term of eight years after May 1, 1903, to be occupied for hotel and saloon purposes, for a rent of $600 a year payable at the rate of $50 every month in advance. The written instrument contained other ordinary provisions of a lease, and also the following:
“ The said first parties further agree that in case they are unable to furnish, that is secure, for the said second parties, or the tenant of said parties, two sufficient bondsmen required by law in case of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cordes v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- American Mercantile Exchange v. BluntSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
- Stewart v. LeonardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
3Cited by12 opinions
- Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Greil Bros. v. MabsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Doherty v. Monroe Eckstein Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Koen v. Fairmont Brewing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Service, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.