Legal Opinion

Wade v. Brockamp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 7, 2015No. C096022CV; A151622PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment vacating petitioner’s convictions and granting her a new trial. Defendant assigns error to the post-conviction court’s determination that petitioner’s criminal trial counsel provided her with constitutionally deficient legal representation by failing to object to a Uniform Criminal Jury Instruction that instructed the jury that a person who aids or abets another in committing a crime is responsible for any other crimes that were a natural and probable consequence of the intended crime. Before petitioner’s post-conviction trial but after her criminal trial, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walraven v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Eklof v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State of Arizona v. William Craig MillerArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Lizarraga-Regalado v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. McMillan v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API