Legal Opinion
Kutz v. Cargill, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 1990No. 56778PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SATZ, Judge.
Plaintiff, Jesse Kutz, (Kutz) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants, Robert Silvey (Silvey)1 and Cargill, Incorporated (Cargill). We affirm.
At the risk of sounding like a common scold, we note again that the record on appeal is, at best, barely sufficient. This is not the first time this Court has been faced with an imprecise record when reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary judgment. See, e.g. Johnson v. Johnson, 764 S.W.2d 711, 713 (Mo.App.1989). Repeatedly, attorneys have elected to live dangerously by relying on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chmieleski v. City Products Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hill v. Air Shields, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bennett v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Eugene Alper Construction Co. v. Joe Garavelli's of West Port, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Roberts Fertilizer, Inc. v. SteinmeierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Meyer v. EnochMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Sun Aviation, Inc. v. L-3 Communications Avionics Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- Porter v. Erickson Transport Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Fenberg v. GogginMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Union Mutual Insurance Co. v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.