Legal Opinion

Estey v. Director of the Division of Employment Security

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 6, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order sustaining answer in abatement and plea in abatement affirmed. This is an appeal by the petitioner from an order of *798the District Court sustaining an answer in abatement and a plea in abatement filed by the respondents to a petition for review under G. L. c. 151A, § 42, of an adverse decision of the board of review of the division of employment security. A copy of the petition and a copy of the order of notice were mailed to the director but no copy of either was given to him for transmission to the other respondent, but a copy of each was given to the other respondent by the petitioner.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kravitz v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Greeley v. Zoning Board of Appeals of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  3. DeFino v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  4. Holliston Mills, Inc. v. Plimpton Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Tilo Co. v. Thomas F.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API