People v. Hinds
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]) and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the first degree (Penal Law § 165.08). The prosecutor’s peremptory challenge to a black prospective juror did not violate defendant’s constitutional right to equal protection under Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79). The prosecutor explained that he challenged the juror because he was an unemployed student with no significant employment history.
*892The prosecutor stated that he looked for jurors with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. HamlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. TambeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. EastmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. HeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. SchumakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. SellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. CarelockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. GantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.