Legal Opinion

State v. Mackey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 14, 2018No. A160107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, P.J.

*445*273Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of strangulation and harassment. Defendant raises four assignments of error. We discuss only defendant's first assignment of error, in which he challenges the exclusion of his father's testimony regarding the alleged victim's character for untruthfulness.1 We conclude that the trial court erred in excluding that character evidence, because defendant established a sufficient foundation for his father's testimony under OEC 608(1). That error was not harmless. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

Because defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. ParkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. EckertOregon Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MackeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. SolanoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API