State v. Park

Defendant appeals from convictions for manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting a letter into evidence that was purportedly written by him and in admitting expert testimony from a police officer. He also argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motions for judgments of acquittal. We affirm.

We review the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the state, because the jury found defendant guilty. State v. Charboneau, 323 Or 38, 40, 913 P2d 308 (1996). United States Forest Service officers…