Legal Opinion

Crilly v. Young

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 7, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,688PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mack

The defendant Young was the owner of a flat building in Chicago which he advertised for sale or for exchange. A firm of real estate brokers saw the advertisement and sent one of their employes to plaintiff’s office to submit a proposition with a view to inducing plaintiff’s client to exchange a farm for it. After various negotiations in which the plaintiff and the defendant met, the deal fell through. Plaintiff went to California and subsequently his clients sold their farm. On his return he again sought the defendant with a view to effecting a sale of the property to the same parties for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loehde v. HalseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. Packer v. SheppardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Van C. Argiris Co. v. Caine Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Doss v. KirkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  3. Rheinberger v. Security Life Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
  4. Ross v. New South Farm & Home Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API