Legal Opinion
State v. Williams
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 11, 2008No. AC 26901PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Stephen J. Williams, appeals from the judgments of the trial court denying his motions to dismiss and his motion for return of bond.1 We dismiss the defendant’s first claim as moot. *325We affirm the judgment of the trial court as to his second claim.
On April 4,2005, in accordance with a plea agreement, the defendant was granted accelerated rehabilitation for a charge of reckless driving in violation of General Statutes § 14-222. By the terms of the agreement, the defendant was given thirty days probation, which was completed on May 4, 2005, and on that date this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- See v. GosselinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Cislo v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Embalmers' Supply Co. v. GiannittiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. GastonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008