Nichols v. Village of Morristown
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
In this case the plaintiff sought an injunction against the obstruction of a Avatercourse and also to compel the village to remove a culvert and install a bridge in its place at a point Avhere the watercourse crosses one of the village streets. He also claims damages for past floodings of his property. After the trial the court made findings and ordered judgment for the defendant, plaintiff moved for amended findings or a new trial, and has appealed from the order denying him that relief. The order refusing the findings is not appealable, and we consider only the order denying a new trial.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Roche v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Nichols v. Village of MorristownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Nichols v. Village of MorristownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938