Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberto Garza Colunga A/K/A Roberto Garza

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1986No. 85-2378PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal we are asked to determine the proper remedy when a defendant pleads guilty to, and is sentenced for, two conspiracies when the evidence establishes that only a single conspiracy exists. We hold that the proper remedy is to vacate both sentences and remand to the District Court for resentencing on one count. However, because the original sentence was imposed under a misapprehension of the maximum possible penalty, the defendant-appellant should be given an opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea after receiving correct sentencing information. If he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Pennsylvania v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Bennie Ray Winship, A/K/A Nip, and Jerry BiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Alion Andersson, United States of America v. Charles W. HinckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Christopher Barry Greer, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, and Jon Lance JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. George Story and Curtis JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Keith Anderson, Byron CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Nellsch v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API