Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Artemus Burkeen, United States of America v. Harold Tucker Matlock, United States of America v. Leamon Louis Matlock

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1965No. 16150-16152_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CECIL, Circuit Judge.

Robert Artemus Burkeen, Harold Tucker Matlock and Leamon Louis Mat-lock, defendants-appellants herein, appeal from a judgment of conviction in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, on a three-count indictment charging robbery of the Bank of Enville, Enville, Tennessee. The case was tried to a jury and all of the appellants were found guilty on the three counts of the indictment. Appellants Burkeen and .Harold Matlock were each given concurrent sentences totalling twenty years on the three counts of the indictment. Appellant Leamon Matlock…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. John E. Beckley, United States of America v. Anderson Stone, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. Honig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  4. United States v. Robert GrimesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  5. Dawes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. James P. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Orville E. Stifel, IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Robert Artemus Burkeen, United States of America v. Harold Tucker MatlockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Herbert Collins BeverlyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Frank J. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API