Legal Opinion

Stinson v. Manning

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1965No. 23141, 23142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

Under the view we take of this case as presented by argument of counsel, there are three principal questions which must be answered.(1) Did the petitioners have an adequate remedy at law under the Election Code of 1964, supra?(2) If the petitioners did not have an adequate remedy at law and could seek equitable relief, did the petition set forth a cause for such relief?(3) Did the petition affirmatively disclose the petitioners were guilty of laches so as to bar their right to the relief prayed?

In the following divisions of this opinion we shall treat the questions in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sellers v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Hoover v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Burkhart v. City of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. DuPre v. CottonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Crow v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCavitt v. Registrars of Voters of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Davidson v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. United States v. John Drew McElrathCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. OdomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API