Legal Opinion
(PC) Anderson v. California Medical Facility
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 5, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02314Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JULIUS ANDERSON, No. 2:18-cv-2314 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action. He has filed a second amended complaint, which is before the Court for screening.1 19 I. Screening Requirement 20 The in forma pauperis statute provides, “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion 21 thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.