Legal Opinion

Bogan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1929No. 12511PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

Two school boys testified for the State. Appellant introduced no-testimony combating or- contradicting that given by these two boys. The indictment charged possession for the purpose of sale of “Certain liquor capable of producing intoxication.” This allegation was sufficiently descriptive of the liquor in question. The motion to quash was properly overruled. Frickie v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep. 254; Piper v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep. 485; Tucker v. State, 94 Texas…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Saucier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Haines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. McKnight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Butts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API