Legal Opinion
Kaminsky v. Kahn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 18, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.
The defendant-appellant appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 and subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
The plaintiff, owner of the controlling block of stock in Spear & Company, finding himself in financial difficulty, attempted to extricate himself therefrom by entering into the agreement which is the subject of the lawsuit. In outline, this agreement provided for the sale of the Spear & Company stock to defendant in return for which defendant agreed to satisfy certain obligations of the plaintiff. There…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Abrams v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Joannes Brothers Co. v. . LambornNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Schenectady Chemicals, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983
- Sankin v. 5410 Connecticut Avenue CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
- John Malasky, Inc. v. MayoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Chavis v. New York Temporary State Commission on LobbyingNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Richard Fulton, Inc. v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977