Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Lincoln County, State of Wisconsin
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 18, 2003No. 02-C-286-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, District Judge.
This is a civil action for monetary relief in which pro se plaintiff Alfred E. Schmidt alleges that defendants Lincoln County, Peter Kachel and the Lincoln County Highway Committee violated his rights under the First Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause and state law by refusing to sell him road salt or other materials in retaliation for comments he made at a county board meeting. Jurisdiction is present. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1367.
The case is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Because I conclude that…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frisenda v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF MALVERNEDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Haka v. Lincoln CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- Foxworthy v. BuetowDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007