Legal Opinion

Matter of Gray v. Dir., Bronx Developmental Servs.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

There is no basis, on this record, for concluding that petitioner’s probationary appointment was terminated for patient abuse, rather than for the stated reason of unsatisfactory performance. Accordingly, petitioner is not entitled to a name-clearing hearing, inasmuch as the reason for dismissal was not of a stigmatizing nature (Matter of Petix v Connelie, 47 NY2d 457). Whether respondent had a good-faith basis for terminating petitioner is an issue beyond our powers of review, given the findings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lentlie v. EganNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Petix v. ConnelieNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roens v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Wright v. GuarinelloNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lyles v. RavitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API