People v. Clark

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [5]), defendant argues that the evidence is insufficient to prove that he knew that he possessed over 500 milligrams of pure cocaine. Defendant failed to preserve that issue for our review (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10), and we decline to exercise our power to review that issue as a matter of discretion in the interest of…