Legal Opinion

People v. Donato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1994PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not err by allowing the prosecutor, on redirect examination of a detective, to elicit evidence that defendants had committed a prior burglary together. Evidence of prior convictions or uncharged crimes may be admitted on redirect examination if, on cross-examination, defendant opens the door to that testimony (People v Melendez, 55 NY2d 445, 451-452). Here, defense counsel tried to create the impression that the detective had focused his investigation on defendant Peak only because Peak was a friend of defendant Donato. Thus, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. MelendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. BurnetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. People v. GilliardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. People v. RivasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. StoutengerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API