Nabkey v. Gibson

OPINION

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

This ease is before the court on three motions: 1) defendants’ August 15,1990 Motion for Dismissal of Remaining Claims Against Defendants Smietanka and Pekrul 1 or in the Alternative Motion for Summary-Judgment; 2) plaintiffs September 12, 1990 Appeal from Magistrate Rowland’s Order denying plaintiffs motion to disqualify Judge Enslen; and 3) plaintiffs September 20,1990 Motion for Sanctions. The only claims remaining in this ease are a section 1985(2) claim and section 1986 claim against defendants Smietanka and Pekrul. The entire complaint against defendant Gibson…