Legal Opinion

Sharp v. West

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided January 30, 1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, District Judge.

This case is here on demurrer to the bill. The grounds of demurrer are that the alleged contract was void under the statute of frauds (section 3654, Kirby’s Dig.) ; second, that it does not state facts sufficient to entitle plaintiff to any relief.

The substantial facts stated in the bill are these: Samuel H. West, a citizen of Missouri, owned five undivided interests or shares in the land described in the bill. West lived in St. Eouis, and Sharp lived at Fayetteville, Ark. On the 13th of October, 1903, West addressed the following letter to Sharp:

“St. Louis Southwestern…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Colson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. Carr v. DuvalSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  5. Maclay v. HarveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ward v. . AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Anderson v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Neer v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  4. Lacey v. BennettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  5. Swanson v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API