Legal Opinion
Williams v. City & Cty. of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 26, 1979No. C-77-1312 SW, C-78-0171 SWPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
These cases are before the court on plaintiffs’ motions for preliminary and permanent injunctions and for summary judgment. After careful consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel, the pleadings, affidavits and depositions on file, and the other evidence in the record, the court finds the plaintiffs are entitled to partial summary judgment.
I
The procedural posture of these cases merits a brief review. Shortly after the complaint was filed in Williams I, (C-77-1312 SW), plaintiffs moved for the issuance of a preliminary injunction…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Guardians Ass'n of New York City Police Department, Inc. v. Civil Service Commission of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- 23 Fair empl.prac.cas. 677, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,153, 6 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 724 the Guardians Association of the New York City Police Department, Inc., the Hispanic Society of the New York City Police Department, Inc., Oswaldo Perez and Felix E. Santos Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Department of Personnel of the City of New York, the New York City Police Department, Alphonse D'ambrose, Individually and in His Capacity as Chairman of the Civil Service Commission of the City of New York and Personnel Director of the City of New York, James Smith and Josephine Gambino, Individually and in Their Capacity as Members of the Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, and Michael J. Codd, Individually and in His Capacity as Commissioner of the New York Police Department, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Maine Human Rights Commission v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Matter of VeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Argus, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.