Legal Opinion

Friedlander v. Hall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 11, 1987No. 86-458PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in a personal injury action brought as a result of a rear-end automobile collision. The plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in denying the motion for new trial and that the trial court improperly charged the jury on the sudden emergency doctrine. We reverse.

On January 2, 1985, Amelia Friedlander, accompanied by her 11-year-old daughter Robin, was driving East on Old Shell Road in Mobile, Alabama. Old Shell Road is a two-lane highway and was relatively congested at the time. The driver of the automobile immediately in front…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Miller v. DacovichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Guthrie v. McCauleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. McKinney v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Glanton v. HuffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jones v. BaltazarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Bettis v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Jones v. LyonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Clayton v. LLB TIMBER CO., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Bennett v. WinquestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API