Legal Opinion

Claim of Guarino v. Natslock, Inc. & Natlock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 10, 1999, which ruled that claimant did not sustain an occupational disease and denied workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant was employed by Natslock, Inc. & Natlock as an executive salesperson which required that he work at a computer and use a telephone throughout most of his eight-hour work day. In July 1992, after working for Natslock for approximately 15 years, claimant was forced to leave his employment because of severe neck pain and seek workers’ compensation benefits claiming an aggravation of a congenital…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Spoerl v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Claim of Cocco v. New York City Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Nicholson v. Mohawk Valley Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ferraina v. Ontario HondaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Baker v. Orange Heating & CoolingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Fredenburg v. Emerson Power TransmissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API