Theresa Taylor and Larry Taylor v. Raymond Corporation, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
The Taylors filed this diversity suit claiming damages under Illinois’ strict product liability statute. The defendant, Raymond Corporation, Inc., moved for summary judgment based on the Illinois statute of repose. The district court granted summary judgment, and this appeal followed. We now affirm the district court’s judgment.
I FACTS
1..
Subsection 13-213 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure provides for three separate periods of repose:
1) Subsection 13 — 213(b) establishes that, “[sjubject to the provisions of subsections (c) and (d),” the period of repose is “12 years from the date of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mega v. Holy Cross HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Calumet County Club v. Roberts EnviRonmental Control Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- American Family Insurance v. Village Pontiac-GMC, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Elliott v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Taylor v. RAYMOND CORPORATIONDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davis v. Toshiba MacHine Co., AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Garza v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Davis v. Toshiba MacH. Co., AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Josephine M. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Ernest W. Rutledge v. Scott Chotin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.