Legal Opinion

Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. Controlled Air, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2009No. 08-1712Published

1Opinion of the Court

574 F.3d 527 (2009)

FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; Austin Maintenance & Construction, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, doing business as Fru-Con/Austin, JV, Appellants,

v.

CONTROLLED AIR, INC., a Kansas Corporation, Appellee.

No. 08-1712.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: September 26, 2008.

Filed: July 24, 2009.

John Roger Edgar, argued, Christopher J. Daus, Sr., and Timothy R. Thornton, on the brief, St. Louis MO, for appellant.

Stephen C. Hiotis, argued, Daniel J. Welsh, and Robert E. Eggmann, on the brief, St. Louis, MO, for appellee.

Before BYE, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API