Carpenter v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Appellant presents in his motion many of the matters decided by us in our original opinion, with the complaint that we were not correct. He insists that we were wrong in holding that his bills of exception 1 and 2, complaining of the overruling of his challenges for cause to certain jurors, showed no error. The bills are qualified by the statement of the trial judge that after holding the jurors in question qualified, and overruling appellant’s challenges for cause, the jurors Keeter and Hulse, stated in appellant’s bills of exception to be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Plair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Stanchel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Salinas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.