Legal Opinion

Bridgeport Savings Bank v. Eldredge

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 15, 1859PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Bill to redeem mortgaged premises. The plaintiffs were second mortgagees. The defendant Eldredge was the grantee of the premises from the Bridgeport bank, which was the first mortgagee.

Read the full summary

Bill to redeem mortgaged premises. The plaintiffs were second mortgagees. The defendant Eldredge was the grantee of the premises from the Bridgeport bank, which was the first mortgagee. The defendants set op in their answer a decree of foreclosure previously obtained by the Bridgeport bank against the present plaintiffs, the time limited by which for the redemption of the premises had expired before the present suit was brought, and averred that the bill of foreclosure was duly served upon the plaintiffs, and that the decree was passed with their full knowledge and acquiescence. On the trial…

1Opinion of the CourtStorks, C. J.

The plaintiffs being second mortgagees, and having acquired by foreclosure the ultimate right to redeem the mortgaged premises from the defendants, who have purchased and therefore represent the interest of the first mortgagee, have clearly the right of redemption sought by this bill, but for the objections urged by the defendants. It is only necessary therefore to notice those objections. The first involves the merits of the case on the facts found by the court, and is confined to the legal effect of the decree of foreclosure obtained by the Bridgeport Bank, under which the defendants claim.…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Griffin v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Callner v. GreenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Blackwell v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Console v. TorchinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API