Legal Opinion
American Portland Cement Alliance v. Environmental Protection Agency and Carol M. Browner, Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 13, 1996No. 95-1230, 95-1231, 95-1237 and 95-1252PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
The sole question in this appeal is whether this court has jurisdiction under § 7006(a)(1) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 et seq. (1982), to review petitions challenging the “Regulatory Determination on Cement Kiln Dust,” issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). 60 Fed.Reg. 7,366 (Feb. 7, 1995). In the Regulatory Determination, EPA decided that cement kiln dust did not warrant full hazardous waste regulation under Subtitle C of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6921-6939e and that it should instead be subject to tailored…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- American Farm Bureau v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Tozzi v. U.S. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- General Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.