Legal Opinion
Michael v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided December 11, 1948No. Claim No. 25419PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
This claim is an old acquaintance. Some time ago the Attorney-General moved for an order dismissing the claim upon the ground that this court was without jurisdiction to hear it because it was not duly filed. Upon the return of the motion, on May 16, 1946, the parties stipulated that the issue *835as to jurisdiction should be tried separately before the trial of the claim upon the merits. Proofs were taken, fifteen exhibits were introduced in evidence by the claimant’s attorney and two by the Attorney-General, and altogether the record of the proceedings comprised some fourteen pages of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Canadian Aviator, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Buckles v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Matter of Baltimore Mail S.S. Co. v. FawcettNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Harvey Chalmers & Son, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tomlinson Construction Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961
- Priel v. LinarelloAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
- Briscoe v. WhiteAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
- Olender v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1949
- Waterside Associates v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.