Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Stroud

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 30, 1992No. 67,799PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, J.:

Jack and Judy Stroud, defendants, appeal the judgment of the district court which ordered a forfeiture of defendants’ security deposit under a residential lease agreement with Steve Burgess, plaintiff. We reverse and remand the cause with directions.

Essentially, we must decide if a tenant’s tendering of notice to vacate leased premises unaccompanied by any action to pay late rent is sufficient to forfeit the tenant’s security deposit under K.S.A. 58-2550(d).

The undisputed facts reduced to their essence are as follows: Plaintiff, d/b/a Garden Spot Rentals, filed a limited action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Todd v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Martindale v. TennySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. United States v. Glen HermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Memorial Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. Kansas Commission on Civil Rights v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heckard v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API